|
Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 5:13:58 GMT -6
That for Many People Their Partisan Class Religion Age Ethnicity or Place of Residence Identities Have Pulled in Opposite Directions for This Plebiscite. This Pushes to the Middle Positions of the Debate. This Vision Assumes That the Main Deficit of the Constituent Process Was the Inability to Incorporate These Traditional Identities in the Symbolic Process of Generating a New Magna Carta. In Particular It Would Have Been Necessary to Find a Way to Present Plurinationalism Within the Framework of an Inclusive Patriotic Sense. This is Certainly Noticeable in Some of the Most. Intemperate Statements of Some Conventional Ones and in Some Performances That Carried Rebellion Seemed to Be Derogatory Speeches Towards People Who Had Traditional National Identities. There Are Also Specific Constitutional Mauritius Email List Norms That Could Have Been Drafted in a Way to Make Equality More Explicit Within the Framework of Diversity. For Example the Borders of the Justice System and Indigenous Autonomy Could Have Been Made More Explicit. The Third Times the Charm There Appears to Be a Relatively Broad Consensus. That Constitutional Stalemate is Not a Viable Option. Furthermore There Seems to Be Some Agreement That a New Constitutional Process Will Have to Include Citizen Participation. This is Likely to Involve Calling a New Convention and an Exit Plebiscite to Ratify a Renewed Constitutional Proposal. That is It is Highly Probable That Chile Will Face a Third Constitutional Plebiscite in a Few More Months. The Precise Form That.
|
|